<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avinash Veeraraghavan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chngyaohong.com/blog/contemporary/avinash-veeraraghavan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chngyaohong.com/blog/contemporary/avinash-veeraraghavan/</link>
	<description>A discovery, discussion and exploration of Asian photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://chngyaohong.com/blog/contemporary/avinash-veeraraghavan/comment-page-1/#comment-9740</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chngyaohong.com/blog/contemporary/avinash-veeraraghavan/#comment-9740</guid>
		<description>this is the lamest &#039;book&#039; produced by tara so far.  &#039;lame&#039; is a huge understatement here. and of course the silly &#039;lamer still&#039; matchbook is even worse.  this is how the publishers are &#039;dumbing down&#039; for the audience i guess?  i wonder how much does this avinash interact (even at just a pathetic pseudo &#039;cerebral level&#039;) with the architecture that his book/photographs/book sleeve annotation pretend to suggest?  if i&#039;m not mistaken these photographs are taken from other sources and &#039;collaged&#039; here for lazy and lame aesthetic pleasure.  &quot;runs a design studio&quot;?  i would like to see a real validation of that statement!  ha ha!  and who the hell is andrea anastasio for our notice?  this is by far the worst book ever to be published by an indian publisher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is the lamest &#8216;book&#8217; produced by tara so far.  &#8216;lame&#8217; is a huge understatement here. and of course the silly &#8216;lamer still&#8217; matchbook is even worse.  this is how the publishers are &#8216;dumbing down&#8217; for the audience i guess?  i wonder how much does this avinash interact (even at just a pathetic pseudo &#8216;cerebral level&#8217;) with the architecture that his book/photographs/book sleeve annotation pretend to suggest?  if i&#8217;m not mistaken these photographs are taken from other sources and &#8216;collaged&#8217; here for lazy and lame aesthetic pleasure.  &#8220;runs a design studio&#8221;?  i would like to see a real validation of that statement!  ha ha!  and who the hell is andrea anastasio for our notice?  this is by far the worst book ever to be published by an indian publisher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Which Main? What Cross?</title>
		<link>http://chngyaohong.com/blog/contemporary/avinash-veeraraghavan/comment-page-1/#comment-5289</link>
		<dc:creator>Which Main? What Cross?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 08:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chngyaohong.com/blog/contemporary/avinash-veeraraghavan/#comment-5289</guid>
		<description>Kix ass</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kix ass</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
